Nevertheless, even at the outset of this latest study, it must be recognised that it too is certain to have a successor. Factors within and around Loch Lomond will change, requiring new insights and fresh visions (so the plan must encompass the practice of continual re-examination and the principle of limited flexibility). Of more immediate importance, and notwithstanding the significant opportunities afforded by recent planning legislation, there is still much that we shall wish to propose, the execution of which will be more difficult or altogether impossible until further legislation Is enacted. There is little doubt, for example, that the comprehensive planning for the management of areas of the size of Loch Lomond must ultimately be able to have formal recognition within an officially accepted hierarchy of 'park' provision for Scotland and the fact that we shall propose a scheme for voluntary collaborative action to the same end will in no way diminish the need for parliamentary support within this decade.
The authors
of the report comprise officials of the countryside commission for Scotland
and the County Planning Departments of the County Council of Dunbartonshire
and Stirlingshire. Although the formation of the group in 1972 arose out
of quite specific discussions about replacing the 1948 Loch Lomond-Trossachs
National Park Direction Area by an Area of Special Planning control under
Section 9 of the 1967 countryside Act for the reasons given in 1.1 above
some such group would have had to b established eventually and we consider
the NPDA-ASPC question mainly of significance in the effect it has had
on timing.